Murphy - Figure 60
Conclusion
FIG. 60: In conclusion, what the results of the HOT-HMV trial[1] are compared with to previous data so that the correct patient population is identified, meaning patients who not only had acute respiratory failure requiring NIV, but also have demonstrable chronic respiratory failure (which is a clearly treatable characteristic), this allowed the addition of home ventilation to confer a significant improvement in admission-free survival over the following 12 months.
It is clear that this admission-free survival is not at the expense of increased levels of exacerbations in the community, but is disease modifying, with a reduction in exacerbation rate as the underlying driver for the change in admission status. What is also clear is that this intervention allows a possible treatment for patients in whom prognosis and outlook is poor, and, therefore, we should be practically screening patients who require acute NIV in the recovery period to identify those with chronic respiratory failure.
Earlier work and these current data also suggest that home ventilation has to be titrated to overnight objective measures of hypoventilation to ensure improvement not only of nocturnal respiratory changes, but also leading to an impact on daytime respiratory failure. Physicians can also to be clear with patients that there is no negative effect of home ventilation on their quality of life, but that there may well be some, at least early, improvement in QOL.
References
Murphy P, Arbane G, Bourke S, et al. Effect of home non-invasive ventilation with oxygen therapy vs oxygen therapy alone on hospital readmission or death after an acute COPD exacerbation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. In press.
Davidson C. 2010 Adult non-invasive ventilation audit summary report. London, UK: British Thoracic Society; 2010. https://www.brit-thoracic.org.uk/document-library/audit-and-quality-improvement/audit-reports/bts-adult-niv-audit-report-2010/ Accessed May 9, 2017.
Chandra D, Stamm JA, Taylor B, et al. Outcomes of noninvasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the United States, 1998–2008. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185:152–9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201106-1094OC.
Brochard L, Mancebo J, Wysocki M, et al. Noninvasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:817−22.
Kramer N, Meyer TJ, Meharg J, et al. Randomized, prospective trial of noninvasive positive pressure ventilatiofrn in acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;151:1799−806. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.151.6.7767523.
Martin TJ, Hovis JD, Costantino JP, et al. A randomized, prospective evaluation of noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161(3 Pt 1):807−13. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.3.9808143.
Bott J, Carroll MP, Conway JH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of nasal ventilation in acute ventilatory failure due to chronic obstructive airways disease. Lancet. 1993;341:1555−7.
Plant PK, Owen JL, Elliott MW. Early use of non-invasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on general respiratory wards: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2000;355:1931−5.
Lightowler JV, Wedzicha JA, Elliott MW, Ram FS. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation to treat respiratory failure resulting from exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003;326:185.
Murray I, Paterson E, Thain G, Currie GP. Outcomes following non-invasive ventilation for hypercapnic exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2011;66:825−6. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.152264.
Chung LP, Winship P, Phung S, et al. Five-year outcome in COPD patients after their first episode of acute exacerbation treated with non-invasive ventilation. Respirology. 2010;15:1084−91. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2010.01795.x.
Connors AF Jr, Dawson NV, Thomas C, et al. Outcomes following acute exacerbation of severe chronic obstructive lung disease. The SUPPORT investigators (Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;154(4 Pt 1):959−67. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.154.4.8887592.
Struik FM, Sprooten RT, Kerstjens HAM, et al. Nocturnal non-invasive ventilation in COPD patients with prolonged hypercapnia after ventilatory support for acute respiratory failure: a randomized, controlled, parallel-group study. Thorax. 2014;69:826−34. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-205126.
Costello R, Deegan P, Fitzpatrick M, McNicholas WT. Reversible hypercapnia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a distinct pattern of respiratory failure with a favorable prognosis. Am J Med. 1997;102:239−44.
Trappenburg JC, Touwen I, de Weert-van Oene GH, et al. Detecting exacerbations using the Clinical COPD Questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8:102. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-102. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-8-102.
Murphy PB, Brignall K, Moxham J, et al. High pressure versus high intensity noninvasive ventilation in stable hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized crossover trial. Int J COPD. 2012;7:811–8. doi: 10.2f147/COPD.S36151.