Dreher - Figure 7

Randomised Crossover Trial

When talking about carbon dioxide (CO2) reduction in stable hypercapnic COPD patients, we note that studies in the past showed that we need higher pressure levels in order to significantly reduce elevated PaCO2 levels.  This Figure shows the results of the first study that compared two treatment strategies for NIV in patients with stable hypercapnic COPD using a randomized crossover design.[3]  The trial compared low-intensity NIV, using a mean inspiratory positive airway pressure (IPAP) of 40.6 mbar, with high-intensity NIV, using a mean IPAP of 28.6 mbar.  The overall aim of high-intensity NIV was to use a step-wise increase in IPAP to significantly reduce elevated levels of arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2).  

The inset in the lower left panel of Figure 7 shows PaCO2 values over time.  The white bars show patients who were treated with high-intensity NIV for 6 weeks and then switched to low-intensity NIV for a further 6 weeks.  The white bars clearly show that during the first 6 weeks of high-intensity NIV there is a significant reduction in PCO2, but once the patients have been switched to low-intensity NIV, PCO2 increases.  

The gray bars represent the patients who were treated first with low-intensity NIV, then switched to high-intensity NIV.  In these patients there was a slight decrease in PCO2 on low-intensity NIV, but after they were switched to high-intensity NIV there was a further significant decrease in PCO2.  

It could be argued that patients with COPD are not tolerating such high levels of IPAP, but the opposite is true.  Patients used high-intensity NIV for a mean of 3.6 hr/night longer than they used low-intensity NIV, apparently because only high-intensity NIV, not low-intensity NIV, was associated with significant improvement in important secondary outcome parameters, meaning dyspnea during exertion, quality of life, and lung function.  

This study showed that high-intensity NIV is better tolerated in patients with severe chronic hypercapnic COPD and is superior to low-pressure NIV in controlling nocturnal hypoventilation.

Dreher M. Chest 2017:00.

References

[3]

Dreher M, Storre JH, Schmoor C, Windisch W. High-intensity versus low-intensity non-invasive ventilation in patients with stable hypercapnic COPD: a randomised crossover trial. Thorax. 2010;65:303−8. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.124263.